![]() ![]() (At some point in the future we may try to distinguish, visually, whether support is available in a specification but still pending in major browsers or applications.) This means that the feature may not be supported in all browsers yet. A specification that is in CR or later and has two implementations in 'major' browsers will count. If a given section in this document refers to more than one feature that is broken, each with different impacts on Web users, the priority for the section should be the lowest denominator.Ī cell can be scored as OK if the feature in question is specified in an appropriate specification, and is supported by user agents. It may not always be straightforward to decide. The decision as to what priority level is assigned to a described gap is down to the experts doing the gap analysis. In this case, the feature can be described here, but the status should be marked as OK. There may be features of a script or language that are not supported on the Web, but that are not generally regarded as necessary (usually archaic or obscure features). ![]() Advanced level support would include additional features one might expect to include in ebooks or other advanced typographic formats. They indicate the impact of a broken or missing feature on the content author or end user.īasic styling is the level that would be generally accepted as sufficient for most Web pages. It is important to note that these colours do not indicate to what extent a particular features is broken. The prioritisation is indicated by colour. This document not only describes gaps, it also attempts to prioritise them in terms of the impact on the local user. 3.9 Punctuation & other inline features.3.8 Grapheme/word segmentation & selection.It is inappropriate to cite this document as otherĭoes not carry any licensing requirements or commitments on this This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by otherĭocuments at any time. This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group as We welcome contributions to this and/or other documents. This document is an individual contribution, and is not currently a work item in any group, however, you can contact the Internationalization Working Group for more information. It is linked to from the language matrix that tracks Web support for many languages. It also checks whether the features have been implemented in browsers and ereaders. ![]() It checks that needed features are supported in W3C specifications, in particular HTML and CSS and those relating to digital publications. In particular, it is concerned with text layout. This document describes and prioritises gaps for the support of N’Ko on the Web and in eBooks. Publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found This section describes the status of thisĭocument at the time of its publication. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |